Hamlet Works

<< Prev 1.. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ..55 Next >>

321 to 330 of 540 Entries from All Files for "johnson" in All Fields

Contract Context Printing 160 characters of context... Expand Context

321) Commentary Note for line 2577+6:
2577+6 {Hoist with his owne petar, an't shall goe hard}

 ... c>Wright</sc> (ed. 1872): “So spelt in the quartos and by all editors to Johnson, who writes ‘petard.' In Cotgrave we have: ‘Petart: A petard ...

322) Commentary Note for line 2585:
2585 <Exit Hamlet tugging in Polonius.> 2585

 ... e 1676 quarto, and Rowe, begin a new act at this point and everyone agrees with Johnson that the division is ‘not very happy'. There should be no division ...

323) Commentary Note for lines 2586-2586+1:
2586 Eenter King {, and Queene, with Rosencraus}

2586+1 {and Guyldensterne}.

 ... 1/john2</sc></sigla><hanging><sc>john1</sc></hanging> <para>2586<tab> </tab><sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): Act IV Scene I] “This play is printed in the old ...

 ... /hanging> <para>2586-2586+1<tab> </tab><sc>Furness (</sc>ed. 1877): “<sc>Johnson</sc>: This modern division into Acts is here not very happy, for the pau ...

 ... is more continuity of action than in almost any other of the scenes'– Johnson. (F.) Dramatically a more natural break is at the end of 4.4 (Hamlet ...

 ... n introduced by Nicholas Rowe in 1709, following the Quarto of 1676, is, as Dr. Johnson noted, not very happy and it should be disregarded. The first three scen ...

 ... , p. 333). The action is continuous, the Queen remaining on stage. <sc>ln</sc>. Johnson had already observed that an act-division here is ‘not very ...

 ... le it set was, unfortunately, followed by Rowe and most subsequent editors. Dr. Johnson recognized this absurdity, and said of it: ‘This modern division i ...

324) Commentary Note for line 2605:
2605 Should haue kept short, restraind, and out of haunt 2605

 ... b> </tab><tab> </tab><tab> </tab><tab> </tab></para> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2605<tab> </tab><tab> </tab></para> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2605<tab> </tab> haunt ] <sc>Johnson</sc> ...

 ... la> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2605<tab> </tab> haunt ] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755): 1. “place in which one is frequently found;”< ...

 ... <hanging><sc>john1/john2</sc></hanging> <para>2605<tab> </tab>haunt] <sc>Johnson </sc>(ed. 1765): “I would rather read, out of harm.&#x201D ...

 ... 2605<tab> </tab>out of haunt] <sc>[Davies]</sc> (ms. notes in <sc>Johnson</sc>, ed. 1765, opp. 8. 248): “Shd. have confined him & restr ...

325) Commentary Note for line 2612:
2612 Ore whom, his very madnes like some ore

 ... anging><sc>john1</sc></hanging> <para>2612<tab> </tab>like some ore] <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): “Shakespeare seems to think ore to be ...

 ... tab>like . . . base] S<sc>eymour</sc> (1805, p. 192): “Dr. Johnson appears to be mistaken here: some precious ore is clearly meant, ...

 ... ing> <para>2612<tab> </tab>ore] <sc>Furness (</sc>ed. 1877): “<sc>Johnson</sc>: Sh. seems to think ‘ore' to be or, that is, gold. <sc ...

 ... ary): “gold. By confusion with ‘Or' the heraldic name for gold (Dr Johnson; Cotgrave glosses ‘ore' as ‘gold').”</para></cn> <cn> ...

 ... f his pure strain of superiority.”</para> <hanging><sc>ard3q2</sc>: Johnson</hanging> <para>2612<tab> </tab>ore] <sc>Thompson & Taylor</sc> (ed. ...

326) Commentary Note for line 2613:
2613 Among a minerall of mettals base,

 ... fsql . . . fnm [=do not change]. </fnc></para></cn> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2613<tab> </tab></para></cn> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2613<tab> </tab> minerall ] <sc>Johnson</s ...

 ... <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2613<tab> </tab> minerall ] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755): “fossil body; matter dug out of mines. All metals ar ...

327) Commentary Note for line 2617:
2617 But we will ship him hence, and this {vile} <vilde> deede

 ... ten so written, though no reason appears for it in the etymology, or otherwise. Johnson writes it vil'd, as if from a verb; but it is not so. See him in ...

328) Commentary Note for lines 2619-20:
2619-20 Both countenaunce and excuse. <Enter Ros.& Guild.> | Ho Guyldensterne,

 ... b> </tab><tab> </tab><tab> </tab><tab> </tab></para> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2619<tab> </tab><tab> </tab></para> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla> <hanging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2619<tab> </tab> countenance ] <sc>Johnson ...

 ... anging>Johnson Dict. </hanging> <para>2619<tab> </tab> countenance ] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755): 1. “the form of the face; the system of the features ...

329) Commentary Note for lines 2645-50:
2645-6 Ham. I sir, that sokes vp the Kings countenaunce, his | rewards, his

2646-7 authorities, but such Officers doe the King | best seruice in the end, he

2647-8 keepes them like an {apple} <Ape> in | the corner of his iaw, first mouth'd to be

2648-9 last swallowed, | when hee needs what you haue gleand, it is but squee-

2650 sing you, and spunge you shall be dry againe.

 ... th the King, but the King is not where the body lies') This is the better idea. Johnson's alteration is nothing worth.”</para></cn> <cn> <sigla>1790<tab> ...

 ... r jaw, and there they keep it, till they have done with the rest.”' <sc>Johnson</sc>.”</para></cn> <cn> <sigla>1866<tab> </tab>Bailey</sigla><han ...

330) Commentary Note for lines 2656-57:
2656-7 Ham. The body is with the King, but the King is not | with the {K2}

2657 body. The King is a thing{.} <—>

 ... hanging> <para>2656-7<tab> </tab>The body is . . . .the body] <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): “This answer I do not comprehend. Perhaps it sho ...

 ... e body is . . . the body] <sc>[Davies]</sc> (ms. notes in <sc>Johnson</sc>, ed. 1765, opp. 8: 251): “H. The body is with ye King but th ...

 ... th the King, but the King is not where the body lies') This is the better idea. Johnson's alteration is nothing worth.”</para></cn> <cn> <sigla>1790<tab> ...

 ... king is a body without a kingly soul, a thing—of nothing.' Johnson would have altered ‘Of nothing' to Or nothing; but S ...

 ... /tab></sc>body . . . body] <sc>Fiebig</sc> (ed. 1857): “Johnson, confessing not to comprehend this answer, says that perhaps it shou ...

 ... </sc>Douce<sc>, rug; </sc>Gielgud<sc>, </sc>Wilson, Eschenburg, Kantorowicz, J. Johnson</hanging> <para>2656-7<tab> </tab>The body . . . body] <sc ...

 ... ng's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theory (Princeton, 1957), J. Johnson explains in the Shakespeare Quarterly 18 (1967), pp. 30-34: &#821 ...

 ... b> </tab><sc>cam4</sc></sigla><hanging><sc>cam4 ≈ </sc>Klein<sc> (</sc>J. Johnson, Kantorowicz); Alexander</hanging> <para>2656-7<tab> </tab>The body < ...

 ... b>The body . . . body] <sc>Edwards</sc> (ed. 1985): “As J. Johnson and N. Alexander have argued (see the latter's Poison, Play and Duel< ...

<< Previous Results
Next Results >>

All Files Commentary Notes
Material Textual Notes Immaterial Textual Notes
Surrounding Context
Range of Proximity searches